No post names them yet.
| FEC ID | Committee | Connected organisation |
|---|---|---|
| C00393041 | FRIENDS OF AMATA | NONE |
"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.
| Candidate ID | Receipts | From individuals | From committees | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H4AS00036 | $39,216 | $20,400 | $17,500 | $36,604 | $4,269 | 06/30/2026 |
Source: FEC bulk file weball26.
| Contributing committee | Total | Contributions | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC | $5,000 | 1 | C00592089 → |
| THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $5,000 | 1 | C00467431 → |
| LAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC | $4,000 | 2 | C00607721 → |
| MAGGIE'S LIST | $3,100 | 2 | C00469023 → |
| SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC | $2,500 | 1 | C00570226 → |
| JIM JORDAN FOR CONGRESS | $2,000 | 1 | C00416594 → |
| SCALISE FOR CONGRESS | $2,000 | 1 | C00394957 → |
| RAPTOR PAC | $1,000 | 1 | C00749481 → |
Top 8 of 8 committees, $24,600 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn. This counts contributions the committee actually received. Independent expenditures — money spent for or against them by groups they do not control — are a separate thing and appear below, not here.
| Payee | Total | Payments | Committee |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMATA, AUMUA | $6,075 | 23 | C00393041 → |
| K.S MART | $5,125 | 1 | C00393041 → |
| ALL STARS SIGNS | $3,148 | 2 | C00393041 → |
| J. LEN T INC | $2,767 | 2 | C00393041 → |
| USLE, MICHAEL LAWRENCE MR. SR. | $2,500 | 3 | C00393041 → |
| GIANT FOODS | $2,119 | 3 | C00393041 → |
| AMATA COLEMAN RADEWAGEN | $1,947 | 6 | C00393041 → |
| PAGO PAGO VILLAGE COUNCIL | $1,500 | 1 | C00393041 → |
Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.
No disclosure filing indexed for them in the 2026 House index.
| Date | Filed by | Type | Payee | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | GLENN DELANEY | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Rep. Amata Radewagen | $500 | filing → |
| 2024-08-27 | JOSE FUENTES | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Amata Coleman Radewagen | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2024-08-27 | JOSE FUENTES | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Amata Coleman Radewagen | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2024-07-03 | AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Amata Radewagen | $800 | filing → |
| 2024-07-02 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring FRIENDS OF AMATA | $500 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2024-06-27 | STEPTOE LLP | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Friends of Amata | $500 | filing → |
| 2024-01-09 | GLENN DELANEY | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Rep. Amata Radewagen | $500 | filing → |
| 2024-01-09 | GLENN DELANEY | FECA | FRIENDS OF AMATA honoring Rep. Amata Radewagen | $500 | filing → |
13 item(s) totalling $30,300 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $30,300 (13). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.
| Sector | Amount | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Party & leadership | $19,000 | 77.2% | |
| Unclassified | $5,600 | 22.8% |
$24,600 in contributions from other political committees, classified by the donor committee's own registered name. Independent spending for or against them is not included here.
House Committee on Natural Resources, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Their PAC total is too small for a meaningful comparison against the chamber average, so none is drawn.
Their ten largest PAC donors supplied 100% of all PAC money they received.
Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.
| Term | What it is | Whose pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Money in | Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. | The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate. |
| Money out | What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. | Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift. |
| Outside spending | Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. | Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it. |
| Personal finances | Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. | The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section. |
Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.
So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.