Jon Ossoff
Public domain — work of the U.S. government
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress · source

Jon Ossoff

U.S. Senator (GA) [Democrat]
Next election November 2026 · class 2

Mentioned in 0 posts on this site

No post names them yet.

Committees registered to them

FEC IDCommitteeConnected organisation
C00718866JON OSSOFF FOR SENATE—

"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.

Campaign totals, 2026 cycle

Candidate IDReceiptsFrom individualsFrom committees DisbursementsCash on handThrough
S8GA00180$77,279,766$67,764,725$920,316$39,682,882$42,587,45106/30/2026

Source: FEC bulk file weball26.

Money in — from other political committees, 2026 cycle

Contributing committeeTotalContributionsRecord
SLF PAC$313,5985C00571703 →
AMERICA ONE$87,5001C00728667 →
HARDWORKING AMERICANS INC.$53,6721C00828608 →
FORWARD BLUE$39,9246C00835041 →
JSTREETPAC$19,96935C00441949 →
ACTIVATE AMERICA$19,11151C00640300 →
CATHOLICVOTE.ORG$17,9381C90011800 →
END CITIZENS UNITED$17,0003C00573261 →
FIELD TEAM 6, INC.$10,0071C00909994 →
VICTORY NOW PAC$10,0002C00416743 →
AMERICAN HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('HOTELPAC')$10,0003C00001198 →
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0003C00030718 →
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC$10,0002C00035451 →
AMERICAN MOBILIZATION PAC$10,0002C00459925 →
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE$10,0003C00032995 →

Top 15 of 191 committees, $1,558,355 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn.

Money out — largest payees, 2026 cycle

PayeeTotalPaymentsCommittee
AISLE 518$21,363,55655C00718866 →
PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING$4,701,99383C00718866 →
FDM CONNECTS LLC$3,292,55419C00718866 →
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES$2,319,69595C00718866 →
MVAR MEDIA LLC$1,197,05314C00718866 →
SPIROS CONSULTING$755,15417C00718866 →
NGP VAN, INC.$641,74324C00718866 →
BUYING TIME, LLC$554,4423C00718866 →

Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.

Outside spending, 2026 cycle

DirectionAmount (net)
Independent expenditures supporting them$67,590
Independent expenditures opposing them$521,963

Spent by groups acting independently of the campaign. Net of amendments, so a total can read negative when corrections outweigh new spending. Source: FEC independent expenditures.

Personal financial disclosure — the private side

Senate disclosures are not published as files that can be linked directly; the Senate requires each search to be run by hand.

Search this person at the Senate Electronic Financial Disclosure database. It covers annual reports, periodic transaction reports for stock trades, and candidate filings.

Lobbying disclosures — what registrants reported (LD-203), 2024–2026

DateFiled byTypePayeeAmountSource
2026-06-30WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.FECAACTBLUE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$55filing →
2026-06-29AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIOFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Ossoff, Jon
$5,000filing →
2026-06-29INNOVATIVE ADVOCACYFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff
$25filing →
2026-06-26MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATIONFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Sen Jon Ossoff
$5,000filing →
2026-06-25NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring US Senator Jon Ossoff
$5,000filing →
2026-06-24REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALLFECAOSSOFF VICTORY FUND
honoring Jon Ossoff
$5,000filing →
2026-06-23INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATIONFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$5,000filing →
2026-06-23AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGYFECAOSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$101filing →
2026-06-16NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCILFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Sen. Jon Ossoff
$5,000filing →
2026-06-15MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.FECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$1,000filing →
2026-06-11MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.FECAOSSOFF VICTORY FUND
honoring Jon Ossoff
$500filing →
2026-06-09INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERSFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring JON OSSOFF
$5,000filing →
2026-06-09AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$1,000filing →
2026-06-08INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERSFECAOSSOFF VICTORY FUND
honoring Jon Ossoff
$2,500filing →
2026-06-05INT'L. ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERSFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Sen. Jon Ossoff
$1,000filing →
2026-06-04BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPT., AFL-CIOFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$3,000filing →
2026-06-02TECHNOLOGY NETWORK AKA TECHNETFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$2,500filing →
2026-05-30CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.FECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Jon Ossoff
$-2,500filing →
2026-05-27LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.FECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Sen. Jon Ossoff
$1,500filing →
2026-05-26UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICAFECAJON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
honoring Senator Jon Ossoff
$1,000filing →

188 item(s) totalling $402,281 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $402,281 (188). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.

What "money in" and "money out" mean here — and what they are not

Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.

TermWhat it isWhose pocket
Money in Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate.
Money out What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift.
Outside spending Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it.
Personal finances Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section.

Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.

So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.

Not shown, and why

How to read this page. Every number comes from a public filing and links to its source, so any row can be checked in one click. Figures are what filers reported; amendments change them, and a net figure can even read as negative when corrections outweigh new spending in a cycle.

A contribution is not evidence of wrongdoing. Giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary, and so is paying a vendor. This page records who gave, who was paid, and what the filings say. It draws no conclusion about influence and alleges no quid pro quo.

Same template for everyone. Every profile is generated by one script from the same sources for the same cycle, whatever the person's party. Where a record does not exist, the page says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as innocence.

Corrections. Every figure links to its record. If one is wrong, tell us — it gets fixed and noted.