Kimberlyn King-Hinds
Public domain — work of the U.S. government
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress · source

Kimberlyn King-Hinds

Delegate (MP at-large)
Next election November 2026
Contact · 202-225-2646 · 425 Cannon House Office Building · official siteOfficial office only. Congress publishes no member email addresses; use the contact form. Download all as CSV

Mentioned in 0 posts on this site

No post names them yet.

Committees registered to them

FEC IDCommitteeConnected organisation
C00873554KING-HINDS FOR CONGRESSNONE

"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.

Campaign totals, 2026 cycle

Candidate IDReceiptsFrom individualsFrom committees DisbursementsCash on handThrough
H4MP01022$64,122$21,445$34,255$59,438$12,15306/30/2026

Source: FEC bulk file weball26.

Money in — from other political committees, 2026 cycle

Contributing committeeTotalContributionsRecord
AMERICA'S BOLD ERA PAC$5,0001C00877365 →
ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,0001C00267849 →
ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC$5,0001C00592089 →
JIM JORDAN FOR CONGRESS$4,0002C00416594 →
DEPENDABLE CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP PAC$2,0001C00775999 →
OLD NORTH LEADERSHIP PAC$2,0001C00577288 →
SPACE COAST LEADERSHIP PAC$2,0001C00877506 →
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,0001C00030718 →
FAA MANAGERS ASSOCIATION INC. PAC$2,0002C00366070 →
BIG IDEAS CREATE EXCELLENCE PAC$1,0001C00765644 →
WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$02C00147173 →

Top 11 of 11 committees, $30,000 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn. This counts contributions the committee actually received. Independent expenditures — money spent for or against them by groups they do not control — are a separate thing and appear below, not here.

Money out — largest payees, 2026 cycle

PayeeTotalPaymentsCommittee
CROWNE PLAZA RESORT$12,7122C00873554 →
KING-HINDS, KIMBERLYN$6,07215C00873554 →
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF THE CNMI$5,0001C00873554 →
LOS CABALLEROS$1,7314C00873554 →
CORAL OCEAN POINT$1,5791C00873554 →
CRUZ, RITA C.$1,4325C00873554 →
UNITED AIRLINES$1,3624C00873554 →
TALAY THAI$1,2958C00873554 →

Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.

Personal financial disclosure — the private side

FiledTypeFiled asDistrictDocument
5/13/2026Annual report (original)Kimberlyn Kay King-HindsMP00filing PDF →
8/12/2025HKimberlyn Kay King-HindsMP00filing PDF →
5/8/2025Filing extensionKimberlyn Kay King-HindsMP00filing PDF →
12/9/2024Candidate reportKimberlyn Kay King-HindsMP01filing PDF →

Filed by the member themselves under the Ethics in Government Act. These cover personal assets, outside income, liabilities and stock transactions — the private side that campaign filings never show. Source: House Clerk.

Lobbying disclosures — what registrants reported (LD-203), 2024–2026

DateFiled byTypePayeeAmountSource
2026-03-25NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORSFECAKING-HINDS FOR CONGRESS
honoring Kimberlyn King-Hinds
$2,000filing →
2025-02-24WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INCFECAKING-HINDS, KIMBERLYN
honoring King-Hinds For Congress
$1,000filing →

2 item(s) totalling $3,000 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $3,000 (2). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.

Where their PAC money came from, 2026 cycle

SectorAmountShare
Party & leadership$14,00046.7%
Unclassified$7,00023.3%
Labor union$5,00016.7%
Ideological / single-issue$2,0006.7%
Finance & insurance$2,0006.7%
Trade association$00.0%

$30,000 in contributions from other political committees, classified by the donor committee's own registered name. Independent spending for or against them is not included here.

Committees they sit on

House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House Committee on Small Business

Their PAC total is too small for a meaningful comparison against the chamber average, so none is drawn.

Their ten largest PAC donors supplied 100% of all PAC money they received.

What "money in" and "money out" mean here — and what they are not

Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.

TermWhat it isWhose pocket
Money in Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate.
Money out What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift.
Outside spending Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it.
Personal finances Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section.

Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.

So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.

Not shown, and why

How to read this page. Every number comes from a public filing and links to its source, so any row can be checked in one click. Figures are what filers reported; amendments change them, and a net figure can even read as negative when corrections outweigh new spending in a cycle.

A contribution is not evidence of wrongdoing. Giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary, and so is paying a vendor. This page records who gave, who was paid, and what the filings say. It draws no conclusion about influence and alleges no quid pro quo.

Same template for everyone. Every profile is generated by one script from the same sources for the same cycle, whatever the person's party. Where a record does not exist, the page says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as innocence.

Corrections. Every figure links to its record. If one is wrong, tell us — it gets fixed and noted.