Chuck Grassley
Public domain — work of the U.S. government
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress · source

Chuck Grassley

U.S. Senator (IA) [Republican]
Next election November 2028 · class 3

Mentioned in 2 posts on this site

Dove Season · Jack Smith’s Strongest Witnesses Were Republicans

Committees registered to them

FEC IDCommitteeConnected organisation
C00230482GRASSLEY COMMITTEE, INC.HAWKEYE FUND

"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.

Campaign totals, 2026 cycle

Candidate IDReceiptsFrom individualsFrom committees DisbursementsCash on handThrough
S0IA00028$328,050$224,442$52,500$300,738$360,21306/30/2026

Source: FEC bulk file weball26.

Money in — from other political committees, 2026 cycle

Contributing committeeTotalContributionsRecord
FASPAC FAREWAY STORES INC PAC$10,0002C00331686 →
EBAY INC-COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE INTERNET COMMERCE, (EBAY PAC)$5,0001C00342394 →
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. ASSOCIATES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,0001C00400705 →
WORKING FOR OHIO$5,0001C00783167 →
DLA PIPER LLP (US) POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DLA PIPER PAC)$5,0001C00151340 →
AXON ENTERPRISE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,0002C00890590 →
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,5001C00147066 →
DEERE & COMPANY PAC (AKA JOHN DEERE PAC)$2,5001C00204099 →
AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION PAC (ASHA PAC)$2,5001C00210666 →
CUNA MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/TRUSTAGE PAC$2,0001C00402107 →
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,0001C00005660 →
DOW INC. PAC (DOWPAC)$1,0001C00074096 →
NOVOCURE INC. PAC (A.K.A. NOVOCURE PAC)$1,0001C00562546 →
THE AMERICAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AOTPAC)$1,0001C00089086 →
TARGET CORPORATION CITIZENS POLITICAL FORUM (TARGETCITIZENS POLITICAL FORUM)$1,0001C00098061 →

Top 15 of 24 committees, $49,167 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn.

Money out — largest payees, 2026 cycle

PayeeTotalPaymentsCommittee
TAG LLC$143,32919C00230482 →
WINRED TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$37,69193C00230482 →
DAVIS, KOLAN$33,2505C00230482 →
ARISTOTLE$15,3006C00230482 →
BARTON, PENNE$10,0612C00230482 →
BAUMGARTEL, ALAN$7,0001C00230482 →
KOLAN DAVIS$6,6501C00230482 →
9SEVEN CONSULTING$5,7316C00230482 →

Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.

Personal financial disclosure — the private side

Senate disclosures are not published as files that can be linked directly; the Senate requires each search to be run by hand.

Search this person at the Senate Electronic Financial Disclosure database. It covers annual reports, periodic transaction reports for stock trades, and candidate filings.

Lobbying disclosures — what registrants reported (LD-203), 2024–2026

DateFiled byTypePayeeAmountSource
2026-06-26HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$5,000filing →
2026-06-24COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$1,000filing →
2026-06-22DLA PIPER LLP (US)FECAHAWKEYE FUND
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2026-06-22WILLIAMS AND JENSEN, PLLCFECAHAWKEYE FUND
honoring Charles Grassley
$500filing →
2026-06-22DLA PIPER LLP (US)FECAGRASSLEY COMMITTEE, INC.
honoring Chuck Grassley
$1,000filing →
2026-06-18DLA PIPER LLP (US)FECAGRASSLEY COMMITTEE, INC.
honoring Chuck Grassley
$5,000filing →
2026-06-18DLA PIPER LLP (US)FECAGRASSLEY COMMITTEE, INC.
honoring Chuck Grassley
$5,000filing →
2026-06-04AMERICAN SOYBEAN ASSOCIATIONFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$1,000filing →
2026-06-02TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP DBA TAFT ADVISORS LLC FKA (TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER,LLP)FECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2026-03-27COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$2,500filing →
2026-03-13UNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$5,000filing →
2026-03-06TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP DBA TAFT ADVISORS LLC FKA (TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER,LLP)FECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2026-02-26AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATIONFECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$2,500filing →
2026-02-05MCGUIREWOODS LLPFECAGRASSLEY COMMITTEE INC.
honoring Chuck Grassley
$1,000filing →
2026-01-08AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATIONFECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$2,500filing →
2025-12-26CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2025-12-26ACG ADVOCACYFECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2025-12-18TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP DBA TAFT ADVISORS LLC FKA (TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER,LLP)FECAHAWKEYE PAC
honoring Chuck Grassley
$500filing →
2025-12-18AMERICAN SOYBEAN ASSOCIATIONFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$2,000filing →
2025-12-16HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALFECATHE HAWKEYE PAC
honoring Charles Grassley
$2,500filing →

98 item(s) totalling $165,750 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $165,750 (98). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.

What "money in" and "money out" mean here — and what they are not

Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.

TermWhat it isWhose pocket
Money in Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate.
Money out What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift.
Outside spending Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it.
Personal finances Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section.

Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.

So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.

Not shown, and why

How to read this page. Every number comes from a public filing and links to its source, so any row can be checked in one click. Figures are what filers reported; amendments change them, and a net figure can even read as negative when corrections outweigh new spending in a cycle.

A contribution is not evidence of wrongdoing. Giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary, and so is paying a vendor. This page records who gave, who was paid, and what the filings say. It draws no conclusion about influence and alleges no quid pro quo.

Same template for everyone. Every profile is generated by one script from the same sources for the same cycle, whatever the person's party. Where a record does not exist, the page says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as innocence.

Corrections. Every figure links to its record. If one is wrong, tell us — it gets fixed and noted.