No post names them yet.
| FEC ID | Committee | Connected organisation |
|---|---|---|
| C00614214 | BERGMANFORCONGRESS | THE BERGMAN VICTORY COMMITTEE |
"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.
| Candidate ID | Receipts | From individuals | From committees | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H6MI01226 | $1,917,574 | $491,107 | $756,925 | $1,368,361 | $660,163 | 07/15/2026 |
Source: FEC bulk file weball26.
Top 15 of 214 committees, $848,169 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn. This counts contributions the committee actually received. Independent expenditures — money spent for or against them by groups they do not control — are a separate thing and appear below, not here.
| Payee | Total | Payments | Committee |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSC STRATEGIES LLC | $275,139 | 5 | C00614214 → |
| FULFILLMENT SOLUTIONS INC. | $91,785 | 40 | C00614214 → |
| ADVICTORY LLC | $90,800 | 6 | C00614214 → |
| GREENLEE CONSULTING | $70,729 | 2 | C00614214 → |
| THE ELEVATED GROUP | $67,936 | 10 | C00614214 → |
| PROFESSIONAL DATA SERVICES | $40,188 | 18 | C00614214 → |
| MDI IMAGING & MAIL | $32,159 | 5 | C00614214 → |
| HOGGE, JAMES | $30,106 | 10 | C00614214 → |
Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.
| Committee | Amount | Filings | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $12,633 | 2 | C00030718 → |
| RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND | $278 | 3 | C00574178 → |
$12,911 from 2 committee(s). Groups spending to support them. They cannot direct this money, and by law may not coordinate with whoever spends it.
| Direction | Amount (net) |
|---|---|
| Independent expenditures supporting them | $12,912 |
| Independent expenditures opposing them | $0 |
Spent by groups acting independently of the campaign. Net of amendments, so a total can read negative when corrections outweigh new spending. Source: FEC independent expenditures.
| Filed | Type | Filed as | District | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/5/2026 | Annual report (original) | John Bergman | MI01 | filing PDF → |
| 5/14/2025 | Annual report (original) | John Bergman | MI01 | filing PDF → |
Filed by the member themselves under the Ethics in Government Act. These cover personal assets, outside income, liabilities and stock transactions — the private side that campaign filings never show. Source: House Clerk.
| Date | Filed by | Type | Payee | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | THE DLM GROUP | FECA | BERGMAN FOR CONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-09-15 | THE DLM GROUP | FECA | BERGMAN FOR CONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | J.A. GREEN AND COMPANY (FORMERLY LLC) | FECA | JACK BERGMAN honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | J.A. GREEN AND COMPANY (FORMERLY LLC) | FECA | JACK BERGMAN honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | FECA | THE GUARDIAN FUND honoring Jack Bergman | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-26 | AUTO CARE ASSOCIATION | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-26 | MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep Jack Bergman | $2,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. | FECA | BERGMAN FOR CONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | LEIDOS, INC. | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | AFLAC INCORPORATED | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. | FECA | THE BERGMAN VICTORY COMMITTEE honoring Jack Bergman | $1,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-25 | SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-24 | CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC | FECA | JACK BERGMAN FOR CONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-24 | YC CONSULTING, LLC | FECA | BERGMAN FOR CONGRESS honoring Jack Bergman | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-24 | NATIONAL STONE, SAND & GRAVEL ASSOCIATION | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep. Jack Bergman | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-24 | AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep Jack Bergman | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-24 | BOEING COMPANY | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep Jack Bergman | $1,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-23 | MICHIGAN FARM BUREAU | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Congressman John Bergman | $2,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-23 | WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY | FECA | BERGMANFORCONGRESS honoring Rep Jack Bergman | $1,000 | filing → |
307 item(s) totalling $559,820 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $559,820 (307). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.
| Sector | Amount | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate | $202,500 | 23.9% | |
| Unclassified | $101,125 | 11.9% | |
| Finance & insurance | $69,000 | 8.1% | |
| Transport | $60,500 | 7.1% | |
| Tech & telecom | $54,500 | 6.4% | |
| Energy & utilities | $54,000 | 6.4% | |
| Trade association | $48,500 | 5.7% | |
| Labor union | $47,500 | 5.6% |
$848,169 in contributions from other political committees, classified by the donor committee's own registered name. Independent spending for or against them is not included here.
House Committee on Armed Services, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House Committee on the Budget
| Sector | Given to them | Their share | Chamber average | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense & aerospace | $41,000 | 4.8% | 1.7% | 2.9x |
| Health & pharma | $30,000 | 3.5% | 5.2% | 0.7x |
Read this as a correlation and nothing more. A member sits on the committee that matches their district, and the industries there fund them for the same reason they are there. It is a question worth asking, not an answer.
Their ten largest PAC donors supplied 12% of all PAC money they received.
Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.
| Term | What it is | Whose pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Money in | Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. | The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate. |
| Money out | What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. | Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift. |
| Outside spending | Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. | Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it. |
| Personal finances | Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. | The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section. |
Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.
So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.