| FEC ID | Committee | Connected organisation |
|---|---|---|
| C00545749 | EMMER FOR CONGRESS | EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE |
| C00573444 | EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE DBA REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY COMMITTEE | NONE |
"Connected organisation" is the sponsoring body named in the committee's own registration — the only corporate tie the filing states outright.
| Candidate ID | Receipts | From individuals | From committees | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H4MN06087 | $9,786,064 | $2,668,455 | $2,244,251 | $6,978,508 | $4,496,007 | 07/22/2026 |
Source: FEC bulk file weball26.
| Committee | Receipts | Disbursements | To other committees | Cash on hand |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE DBA REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY COMMITTEE | $4,869,452 | $5,191,427 | $0 | $91,821 |
Source: FEC bulk file webk26.
Top 15 of 472 committees, $2,410,244 total. Each links to that committee's own FEC page, where its donors are listed in turn. This counts contributions the committee actually received. Independent expenditures — money spent for or against them by groups they do not control — are a separate thing and appear below, not here.
| Payee | Total | Payments | Committee |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRCC | $1,750,000 | 3 | C00545749 → |
| TARGETED VICTORY LLC | $1,175,856 | 20 | C00545749 → |
| 814 CONSULTING | $948,367 | 19 | C00545749 → |
| ADP | $790,933 | 176 | C00545749 → |
| PURCELL CONSULTING LLC | $273,022 | 13 | C00545749 → |
| ELLIOTT GROUP CONSULTING LLC | $256,063 | 12 | C00545749 → |
| PINNACLE DIRECT | $255,222 | 8 | C00545749 → |
| SLMG LLC | $179,346 | 19 | C00545749 → |
| EMMER FOR CONGRESS | $1,446,365 | 13 | C00573444 → |
| DIRECT SUPPORT SERVICES | $1,129,049 | 37 | C00573444 → |
| NRCC | $928,416 | 16 | C00573444 → |
| PLANET DIRECT INC | $366,012 | 26 | C00573444 → |
| CONSOLIDATED MAILING SERVICES | $246,905 | 31 | C00573444 → |
| FORTHRIGHT STRATEGY INC | $221,488 | 22 | C00573444 → |
| LEGACY LISTS INC | $126,554 | 16 | C00573444 → |
| ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS | $108,130 | 3 | C00573444 → |
Vendors and operating costs, not political giving. See the explainer below for what this money can and cannot be used for.
| Committee | Amount | Filings | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| MINNESOTA DEMOCRATIC-FARMER-LABOR PARTY | $1,094 | 2 | C00025254 → |
$1,094 from 1 committee(s). Groups spending to defeat them. This is money spent against this member — it is not money they received, and it is not theirs.
| Direction | Amount (net) |
|---|---|
| Independent expenditures supporting them | $0 |
| Independent expenditures opposing them | $547 |
Spent by groups acting independently of the campaign. Net of amendments, so a total can read negative when corrections outweigh new spending. Source: FEC independent expenditures.
| Filed | Type | Filed as | District | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/29/2026 | Annual report (original) | Thomas Earl Emmer | MN06 | filing PDF → |
| 5/13/2025 | Annual report (original) | Thomas Earl Emmer | MN06 | filing PDF → |
Filed by the member themselves under the Ethics in Government Act. These cover personal assets, outside income, liabilities and stock transactions — the private side that campaign filings never show. Source: House Clerk.
| Date | Filed by | Type | Payee | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer, Jr. | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS | FECA | EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE DBA REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY COMMITTEE honoring EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE DBA REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY COMMITTEE | $500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | TODD STRATEGY GROUP | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring U.S. Representative Tom Emmer | $4,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | EBAY INC. | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer, Jr. | $4,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC. | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Tom Emmer | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | TODD STRATEGY GROUP | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring U.S. Representative Tom Emmer | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Tom Emmer (R-MN) | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | CALPORTLAND COMPANY | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Tom Emmer | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | EBAY INC. | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer, Jr. | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-30 | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Tom Emmer | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INC | FECA | EMMER, TOM honoring Emmer For Congress | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOP | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | MELLON FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION #1 | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer | $5,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | H&R BLOCK MANAGEMENT, LLC, A SUBSIDIARY OF H&R BLOCK, INC. | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer, Jr. | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer, Jr. | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. | FECA | ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC honoring Tom Emmer | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | POLARIS GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC | FECA | EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS honoring Tom Emmer | $2,500 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | SOUTHWEST AIRLINES | FECA | EMMER FOR CONGRESS honoring Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) | $2,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-29 | S-3 GROUP | FECA | EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS honoring Tom Emmer | $1,000 | filing → |
| 2026-06-28 | H&M STRATEGIES LLP | FECA | EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS honoring Tom Emmer | $500 | filing → |
1577 item(s) totalling $4,510,401 across 2024–2026 filings, reported by lobbying registrants and lobbyists on form LD-203. By category: FECA $4,507,901 (1576); Honorary Expenses $2,500 (1). These are their disclosures, not this person's: twice a year, registrants must report political contributions and certain honorary payments. An entry here means a lobbying organisation reported money to a committee of theirs or to an event honouring them — it is not a payment to them personally, and it is not evidence of any arrangement. The categories are not equivalent: FECA items are ordinary campaign contributions, while inaugural, library and honorary entries are payments to separate funds that carry no contribution limits. Source: Senate Office of Public Records.
| Sector | Amount | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate | $777,000 | 32.2% | |
| Finance & insurance | $365,000 | 15.1% | |
| Trade association | $249,000 | 10.3% | |
| Health & pharma | $159,500 | 6.6% | |
| Energy & utilities | $145,000 | 6.0% | |
| Unclassified | $125,800 | 5.2% | |
| Tech & telecom | $109,500 | 4.5% | |
| Agriculture & food | $98,500 | 4.1% |
$2,410,244 in contributions from other political committees, classified by the donor committee's own registered name. Independent spending for or against them is not included here.
House Committee on Financial Services
| Sector | Given to them | Their share | Chamber average | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & insurance | $365,000 | 15.1% | 9.7% | 1.6x |
| Real estate & construction | $40,000 | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.9x |
Read this as a correlation and nothing more. A member sits on the committee that matches their district, and the industries there fund them for the same reason they are there. It is a question worth asking, not an answer.
Their ten largest PAC donors supplied 4% of all PAC money they received.
Everything in the money tables on this page is campaign money, not personal money. It belongs to a political committee, not to the person. The two are separate by law, and this page never mixes them.
| Term | What it is | Whose pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Money in | Contributions a committee received — from individuals, from other political committees (PACs), from party committees. Capped per donor per election and itemised above $200. | The committee's account. Not personal income, and not taxable to the candidate. |
| Money out | What the committee spent: staff, consultants, advertising, travel, rent, card processing, taxes, and contributions to other candidates. Mostly vendors, not politics. | Paid to outside businesses and people. A payee is a supplier, not a beneficiary of a gift. |
| Outside spending | Money spent for or against someone by groups acting independently, who may not coordinate with the campaign. | Never touches the candidate's committee. They cannot direct it or refuse it. |
| Personal finances | Salary, assets, debts, stock trades, outside income, a spouse's employment. | The person's own accounts — not shown in any FEC table. It appears only in the financial-disclosure filings linked in their own section. |
Can campaign money become private money? Not lawfully. Converting campaign funds to personal use is prohibited by 52 U.S.C. § 30114, and the FEC applies an "irrespective test": if the expense would exist even without the campaign — a mortgage, a country-club membership, household groceries — campaign funds cannot pay for it. Salaries to the candidate are allowed only within narrow limits, and payments to a candidate's own business must be at fair market value.
So where would private enrichment show up? Not in the tables above. It would show in the financial-disclosure filings — assets, outside income, stock transactions — or in payments from a committee to a business the person owns, which appear as ordinary payees in "money out". This page gives you both sets of records and leaves the reading to you.