Not a Campaign Ad

He swapped the fine print from a 2024 campaign spot to “Paid for by the U.S. Government,” told Republicans to pretend he is on the midterm ballot, and called the rerun a public service announcement.

September 30, 2026

“The announcements are very clearly not campaign ads.”

That was the White House line after three taxpayer-funded television spots starring Donald Trump hit national air — NFL games, Sunday talk shows, cable — with the chyron Paid for by the U.S. Government. One of them is a near-copy of a 2024 campaign commercial. The song under another was never licensed. The defense is that the president is not on the November ballot and there is no “call to action.” Read the board: The Guardian, TIME, FactCheck.org, CBC News.

You do not get to recycle a campaign ad, change the payer line, and invent a new genre of patriotism.

The Swap

Start with the black-and-white corridor walk. In 2024 it ended with a campaign ask and fine print for Donald J. Trump for President 2024, Inc. In 2026 the same stern march and the same “final battle” voiceover land with a new footer: Paid for by the U.S. Government. Deep state. Warmongers. Globalists. Fake news. Same soundtrack of grievance — new checkbook. Coverage of the copy-paste: TIME, Poynter, Ars Technica.

Then the Love Me montage: communism denounced, tax cuts bragged, Dana White praise clip, choir looping the title lyric. Musician JMSN says he never authorized the track; his lawyers sent a cease-and-desist to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles demanding the spot come down. A PSA that steals a love song is still a heist. See: USA TODAY, CBS News, CNN.

Third spot: Mount Rushmore scenery, July speech clips, “golden age of America.” Same disclaimer. Same timing — weeks before a midterm the GOP is sweating.

AdImpact puts the airtime so far in the millions. Funding traced to U.S. Customs and Border Protection inside DHS — the immigration agency buying presidential branding while border politics remain a campaign product. Board: CBC News, NBC Washington, The Guardian.

Watch the pattern, not the spin. CBS segment on the Love Me buy: CBS News video.

The Defense That Melts

White House release: Presidential Public Service Announcements Are Nothing New. Bush Medicare. Obama HealthCare.gov. Biden vaccine “We Can Do This.” All cited as cousins.

FactCheck walked the cousins. HealthCare.gov spots told people how to enroll and what premiums looked like. Biden’s vaccine campaign pointed people to vaccines.gov. Bush’s Medicare spots were contested, and GAO still dinged related video news releases as unlawful covert propaganda. None of those were a president’s own 2024 campaign reel with the payer line rewritten. Expert judgment: the Trump spots are propaganda, not program education. Read it: FactCheck.org, Poynter.

“Trump is not on the ballot” is the magic phrase. He told the RNC midterm convention crowd to pretend he is — vote as if his name sits on the line so the House and Senate stay red. The Hill, Roll Call.

If the strategy is pretend-ballot, the ad book does not get a clean slate because the FEC form is blank.

Annual appropriations language has banned using federal funds for publicity or propaganda for decades. Public Citizen has complained to GAO, the Office of Special Counsel, and now the FCC and FTC, urging broadcasters to pull spots that do not qualify as candidate ads (Trump is not a candidate) and do not meet PSA standards (no specific government program explained). Letter and roundup: Public Citizen PDF, The Guardian, Ars Technica.

Former Bush ethics lawyer Richard Painter and other ethics alumni called the videos clear midterm boosters, not PSAs. Samuel Bagenstos, former HHS general counsel: basically impossible to invent a respectable contrary argument. FactCheck.org, Poynter.

Bipartisan Wince, Selective Courage

This is not only a Democratic press release.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune: likes the message, shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars. Sen. John Kennedy on Face the Nation: no public official — including Trump — should spend public money on private ads for themselves. Sen. Thom Tillis compared the vibe to Viktor Orbán territory and called it inappropriate. Rep. Thomas Massie: legal… in banana republics. Sen. Mike Rounds: not something he would have done. Quotes: TIME, NBC Washington, CBC News.

Liking the message while outsourcing the bill is not a principle. It is a coupon.

Democrats are right that self-aggrandizing airtime on the public dime is corrupt. They are also the party that screamed “propaganda” when Trump-era HHS hired Fors Marsh in 2020, then watched Biden run the vaccine campaign off related machinery — and they are not wrong that COVID shots are not the same product as “demolish the deep state.” Hold both: past PSAs that taught a program are not a blank check for presidential brand ads. Schumer’s “pure propaganda” line lands because the chyron does. Coverage: FactCheck.org, CBC News.

The Split Screen

Same week the White House moved to pocket-rescind $810 million Congress already appropriated — health, education, housing counseling — branded as waste five days before the fiscal year dies. We covered that trapdoor in The Purse Is Optional.

Fiscal virtue that cancels appropriated aid while CBP underwrites a Love Me tour is not temperance. It is a media buy.

Remember Kristi Noem’s earlier DHS ad blitz — hundreds of millions, Trump reportedly furious she said he signed off — then this sequel with his face and his voice. Continuity of brand, discontinuity of shame. The Guardian, TIME.

Questions for the Airtime

If this is a PSA, which government program does “demolish the deep state” enroll you in?

If Trump is not on the ballot, why tell voters to pretend he is?

If the 2024 spot was a campaign ad, what alchemy turns the same reel into civic education besides the payer line?

If Republicans like the message, why won’t they pay for it with party money?

If Democrats want a bright line against propaganda, will they keep it when the next White House is theirs?

If CBP’s mission is the border, why is it underwriting a golden-age montage?

If the artist says stop using the song, why is “Love Me” still a taxpayer loop?

Closing Argument

Three spots. Millions in public airtime. A recycled campaign commercial. An unauthorized love song. A pretend-ballot speech. A White House statement insisting this is nothing new. Republicans who wince and keep the majority. Democrats who discovered the rule again. A pocket rescission of health money next to a government-funded ego buy.

That is not a public service. That is a campaign that found a better funder. The receipt is the swap. The country is the underwriter. The midterms are the air date.

— Hypocrisy Democracy

Receipts

Three taxpayer-funded Trump TV ads; “Paid for by the U.S. Government”; Public Citizen to FCC/FTC; CBP funding; cost estimates: The Guardian, TIME, CBC News, NBC Washington, Ars Technica, Public Citizen complaint
Final Battle = near-copy of 2024 campaign ad; Love Me / JMSN cease-and-desist; Mount Rushmore golden-age spot: TIME, Poynter, USA TODAY, CBS News, CNN, CBS News video
White House PSA defense vs expert pushback; Bush/Obama/Biden comparisons: White House release, FactCheck.org, Poynter
“Pretend I’m on the ballot” midterm convention: The Hill, Roll Call
GOP criticism (Thune, Kennedy, Tillis, Massie, Rounds): TIME, NBC Washington, CBC News
Same-week pocket rescission contrast: The Purse Is Optional
Context board: Hypocrisy Democracy

If you haven’t subscribed, now’s a good time. Everything here stays free, always. But pieces like this take days of research, writing, and fact checking, and if you’d like to support that work, paid subscriptions are there. Thank you for your support!

Thanks for reading, sharing, and commenting.

If this hit home, Subscribe for free — or Donate to keep Hypocrisy Democracy running.

Get it in your inbox